<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Priority of machines to get for woodworking (part 1)	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.rpwoodwork.com/blog/2026/07/17/priority-of-machines-to-get-for-woodworking-part-1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.rpwoodwork.com/blog/2026/07/17/priority-of-machines-to-get-for-woodworking-part-1/</link>
	<description>inside the woodshop</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2026 13:21:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Rob		</title>
		<link>https://www.rpwoodwork.com/blog/2026/07/17/priority-of-machines-to-get-for-woodworking-part-1/#comment-565496</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rob]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2026 13:21:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.rpwoodwork.com/blog/?p=8804#comment-565496</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Yea, Ray, that may be best for some folks. 

These choices come down to an individual&#039;s building intentions, working preferences, space, and budget.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yea, Ray, that may be best for some folks. </p>
<p>These choices come down to an individual&#8217;s building intentions, working preferences, space, and budget.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Ray Collins		</title>
		<link>https://www.rpwoodwork.com/blog/2026/07/17/priority-of-machines-to-get-for-woodworking-part-1/#comment-565414</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ray Collins]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2026 06:13:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.rpwoodwork.com/blog/?p=8804#comment-565414</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I would suggest a bandsaw as No. 1. Two reasons, you can do many projects at minimal outlay and secondly, it does not require a dust extaction system.
I would rate the thicknesser as No. 2 because it definitely requires a dust extractor to go with it as No. 3]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would suggest a bandsaw as No. 1. Two reasons, you can do many projects at minimal outlay and secondly, it does not require a dust extaction system.<br />
I would rate the thicknesser as No. 2 because it definitely requires a dust extractor to go with it as No. 3</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Rob		</title>
		<link>https://www.rpwoodwork.com/blog/2026/07/17/priority-of-machines-to-get-for-woodworking-part-1/#comment-565158</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rob]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2026 00:30:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.rpwoodwork.com/blog/?p=8804#comment-565158</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Thanks, Thomas.
Yea, woodworking machinery is expensive. But so is the TIME that a thickness planer saves you. And nice wood is ultimately even more expensive!
I had to use (long story) a $350 Craftsman thickness planer for a few months. It worked surprisingly well. Sure, the Oliver at 3x the cost is way better. There are low cost ways to get most of the benefits of most woodworking machines. 
A 13&quot; thickness planer takes up little space and is generally not too difficult to move. It can be stored on the side and used on the regular workbench.  
Different ways to work and manage.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Thomas.<br />
Yea, woodworking machinery is expensive. But so is the TIME that a thickness planer saves you. And nice wood is ultimately even more expensive!<br />
I had to use (long story) a $350 Craftsman thickness planer for a few months. It worked surprisingly well. Sure, the Oliver at 3x the cost is way better. There are low cost ways to get most of the benefits of most woodworking machines.<br />
A 13&#8243; thickness planer takes up little space and is generally not too difficult to move. It can be stored on the side and used on the regular workbench.<br />
Different ways to work and manage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Thomas Milne		</title>
		<link>https://www.rpwoodwork.com/blog/2026/07/17/priority-of-machines-to-get-for-woodworking-part-1/#comment-565147</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Thomas Milne]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 22:37:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.rpwoodwork.com/blog/?p=8804#comment-565147</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Straight away you hit the turn off button with a four figure cost. That and the physical size of a planer. 
Not all of us have deep pockets nor wide spaces for use, once my bench was made there is not much more room for big machinery pieces.
Hopefully you web site will give us more hope and help with other ideas.
Thanks and regards,
Thomas]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Straight away you hit the turn off button with a four figure cost. That and the physical size of a planer.<br />
Not all of us have deep pockets nor wide spaces for use, once my bench was made there is not much more room for big machinery pieces.<br />
Hopefully you web site will give us more hope and help with other ideas.<br />
Thanks and regards,<br />
Thomas</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Joe Leonetti		</title>
		<link>https://www.rpwoodwork.com/blog/2026/07/17/priority-of-machines-to-get-for-woodworking-part-1/#comment-561193</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joe Leonetti]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2026 18:22:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.rpwoodwork.com/blog/?p=8804#comment-561193</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hi Rob,
I’m enjoying the series.  I totally understand why and how your top three have gone.  Different than mine?  Sure but it’s fun to see.  Once I got my top two, thicknesser and bandsaw, I was much happier to have the electrons do the donkey work.  I have a next door neighbor how I am really good friends with.  We’ve vacationed together and do a weekly caring class and have taken wood turning classes together as well.  His choices line up with yours and we bust each other’s chops on a regular basis in a fun way.
Sincerely,
Joe]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Rob,<br />
I’m enjoying the series.  I totally understand why and how your top three have gone.  Different than mine?  Sure but it’s fun to see.  Once I got my top two, thicknesser and bandsaw, I was much happier to have the electrons do the donkey work.  I have a next door neighbor how I am really good friends with.  We’ve vacationed together and do a weekly caring class and have taken wood turning classes together as well.  His choices line up with yours and we bust each other’s chops on a regular basis in a fun way.<br />
Sincerely,<br />
Joe</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Rob		</title>
		<link>https://www.rpwoodwork.com/blog/2026/07/17/priority-of-machines-to-get-for-woodworking-part-1/#comment-558514</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rob]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 03:11:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.rpwoodwork.com/blog/?p=8804#comment-558514</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Thanks, Joe. 
Second tool will not be a bandsaw. All just my opinion though.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Joe.<br />
Second tool will not be a bandsaw. All just my opinion though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Joe Leonetti		</title>
		<link>https://www.rpwoodwork.com/blog/2026/07/17/priority-of-machines-to-get-for-woodworking-part-1/#comment-558372</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joe Leonetti]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 06:04:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.rpwoodwork.com/blog/?p=8804#comment-558372</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I agree that a thicknesser is probably the most handy tool to have if one wants to have minimal machines.  Nothing takes more effort with hand tools than reducing the thickness of many boards.  I have the DeWalt one as the Oliver was too new when I was buying and there were literally no reviews on it.  Within last 6 months the local woodcarving school I go to got the exact Oliver you have.  It’s a nice machine for sure.

My guess on tool number two would be a bandsaw.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that a thicknesser is probably the most handy tool to have if one wants to have minimal machines.  Nothing takes more effort with hand tools than reducing the thickness of many boards.  I have the DeWalt one as the Oliver was too new when I was buying and there were literally no reviews on it.  Within last 6 months the local woodcarving school I go to got the exact Oliver you have.  It’s a nice machine for sure.</p>
<p>My guess on tool number two would be a bandsaw.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/?utm_source=w3tc&utm_medium=footer_comment&utm_campaign=free_plugin

Page Caching using Disk: Enhanced 

Served from: www.rpwoodwork.com @ 2026-09-01 02:04:09 by W3 Total Cache
-->