<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Plane iron camber, part 1: three guidelines	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.rpwoodwork.com/blog/2017/04/30/plane-iron-camber-part-1-three-guidelines/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.rpwoodwork.com/blog/2017/04/30/plane-iron-camber-part-1-three-guidelines/</link>
	<description>inside the woodshop</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 May 2017 20:04:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Rob		</title>
		<link>https://www.rpwoodwork.com/blog/2017/04/30/plane-iron-camber-part-1-three-guidelines/#comment-247015</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rob]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 May 2017 23:19:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rpwoodwork.com/blog/?p=4781#comment-247015</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Oops! Got it now. I have the Veritas 62 ½. Anyway, I agree, BU planes do have convenience and versatility in their favor.
Rob]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oops! Got it now. I have the Veritas 62 ½. Anyway, I agree, BU planes do have convenience and versatility in their favor.<br />
Rob</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Steven Herbin		</title>
		<link>https://www.rpwoodwork.com/blog/2017/04/30/plane-iron-camber-part-1-three-guidelines/#comment-247004</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Herbin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 May 2017 15:09:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rpwoodwork.com/blog/?p=4781#comment-247004</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hi Rob-

No, LN = Lie Nielsen. The LN 62 is a low angle B/U plane. I like the traditional planes made by Lie Nielsen. Too many doodads on Veritas. 

-- Steve.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Rob-</p>
<p>No, LN = Lie Nielsen. The LN 62 is a low angle B/U plane. I like the traditional planes made by Lie Nielsen. Too many doodads on Veritas. </p>
<p>&#8212; Steve.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Rob		</title>
		<link>https://www.rpwoodwork.com/blog/2017/04/30/plane-iron-camber-part-1-three-guidelines/#comment-247003</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rob]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 May 2017 13:52:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rpwoodwork.com/blog/?p=4781#comment-247003</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Steve, You mean the 62 1/2, the low-angle jack, right? (Why does Veritas come up with these 1/2 numbers for planes?) Yea, I like it a lot too, for the same reasons you state. I&#039;ll have more to say about camber that relates to such planes in the next post.
Rob]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve, You mean the 62 1/2, the low-angle jack, right? (Why does Veritas come up with these 1/2 numbers for planes?) Yea, I like it a lot too, for the same reasons you state. I&#8217;ll have more to say about camber that relates to such planes in the next post.<br />
Rob</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Steven Herbin		</title>
		<link>https://www.rpwoodwork.com/blog/2017/04/30/plane-iron-camber-part-1-three-guidelines/#comment-247001</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Herbin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 May 2017 12:54:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rpwoodwork.com/blog/?p=4781#comment-247001</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hi Rob-

I just did 3 things that have really bumped up my planing.

First, I decided to concentrate on using my LN 62. I find that concentrating on using this plane, getting my body mechanics in tune with it, notches me up.

Second, I put a nice, gently camber on my A-2 blades, using the Eclipse jig. It has made me more careful about the sharpening process and finger pressure. Secondary bevel of 30 degrees.

Third, I put a 45 degree secondary bevel on one of my 62 blades (I have a lifetime supply -- long story). This allows me to plane Sapele (my favorite furniture and box wood) without tearout. I&#039;m sure it&#039;s a combination of the angle, careful sharpening and cambering.

It&#039;s not that I dislike the LN #4 or any of my other general purpose planes, it&#039;s just so much easier to task blades and sharpen them accordingly on a bevel up. The 62 is a wonderful bevel up.

Just my 2 cents.

Thanks for your efforts,
Steve.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Rob-</p>
<p>I just did 3 things that have really bumped up my planing.</p>
<p>First, I decided to concentrate on using my LN 62. I find that concentrating on using this plane, getting my body mechanics in tune with it, notches me up.</p>
<p>Second, I put a nice, gently camber on my A-2 blades, using the Eclipse jig. It has made me more careful about the sharpening process and finger pressure. Secondary bevel of 30 degrees.</p>
<p>Third, I put a 45 degree secondary bevel on one of my 62 blades (I have a lifetime supply &#8212; long story). This allows me to plane Sapele (my favorite furniture and box wood) without tearout. I&#8217;m sure it&#8217;s a combination of the angle, careful sharpening and cambering.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not that I dislike the LN #4 or any of my other general purpose planes, it&#8217;s just so much easier to task blades and sharpen them accordingly on a bevel up. The 62 is a wonderful bevel up.</p>
<p>Just my 2 cents.</p>
<p>Thanks for your efforts,<br />
Steve.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/?utm_source=w3tc&utm_medium=footer_comment&utm_campaign=free_plugin

Page Caching using Disk: Enhanced 

Served from: www.rpwoodwork.com @ 2026-10-30 09:38:02 by W3 Total Cache
-->