<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Table saw vs. bandsaw, Round 1	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.rpwoodwork.com/blog/2012/07/04/table-saw-vs-bandsaw-round-1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.rpwoodwork.com/blog/2012/07/04/table-saw-vs-bandsaw-round-1/</link>
	<description>inside the woodshop</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Apr 2013 04:02:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Rob		</title>
		<link>https://www.rpwoodwork.com/blog/2012/07/04/table-saw-vs-bandsaw-round-1/#comment-111274</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rob]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2012 17:34:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rpwoodwork.com/blog/?p=1749#comment-111274</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Thanks for the comment, Matt.

The bandsaw does require more ongoing tuning such as when changing blades, but I think the initial setup of a table saw is more work than for a bandsaw.

As for interpreting the result of bandsaw work, yes, it does not produce the neatness of table saw cuts. By adjusting your approach to building, you can become comfortable with the nature of the band saw. 

Still, it is nice to have both tools.

Rob]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comment, Matt.</p>
<p>The bandsaw does require more ongoing tuning such as when changing blades, but I think the initial setup of a table saw is more work than for a bandsaw.</p>
<p>As for interpreting the result of bandsaw work, yes, it does not produce the neatness of table saw cuts. By adjusting your approach to building, you can become comfortable with the nature of the band saw. </p>
<p>Still, it is nice to have both tools.</p>
<p>Rob</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: matthew hills		</title>
		<link>https://www.rpwoodwork.com/blog/2012/07/04/table-saw-vs-bandsaw-round-1/#comment-111256</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[matthew hills]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2012 18:18:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rpwoodwork.com/blog/?p=1749#comment-111256</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The perception you described at the start is pretty much where I&#039;ve been, so I&#039;m looking to see where you go on this topic.  I would also add that the table saw&#039;s alignment/setup is more easily understood.  The bandsaw seems more flexible/complex, and it is harder to interpret the result -- whether that is the nature of a bandsaw, the setup of the machine, or technique, etc.

Matt]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The perception you described at the start is pretty much where I&#8217;ve been, so I&#8217;m looking to see where you go on this topic.  I would also add that the table saw&#8217;s alignment/setup is more easily understood.  The bandsaw seems more flexible/complex, and it is harder to interpret the result &#8212; whether that is the nature of a bandsaw, the setup of the machine, or technique, etc.</p>
<p>Matt</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/?utm_source=w3tc&utm_medium=footer_comment&utm_campaign=free_plugin

Page Caching using Disk: Enhanced 

Served from: www.rpwoodwork.com @ 2026-07-05 19:15:09 by W3 Total Cache
-->