<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Improving gimlets &#8211; yes, they can work</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rpwoodwork.com/blog/2010/10/19/improving-gimlets-yes-they-can-work/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rpwoodwork.com/blog/2010/10/19/improving-gimlets-yes-they-can-work/</link>
	<description>inside the woodshop</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 14:51:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adrian</title>
		<link>http://www.rpwoodwork.com/blog/2010/10/19/improving-gimlets-yes-they-can-work/#comment-30430</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Feb 2011 18:39:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rpwoodwork.com/blog/?p=925#comment-30430</guid>
		<description>I finally managed to snatch a couple minutes to modify another one.   I tried it before.  It took for ever to start and then it split the work.  I modified it.  Then it seemed to dive into the wood...much faster start, certainly...but it still split the work.  Maybe I was too close to the edge for hope of not splitting, about 1/2&quot;.   But the other modified one seems to be much slower.   The test piece is only 1/2&quot; thick, so maybe I&#039;ll try deeper holes in something else.   I&#039;m wondering if I made the tip sharper on the second one and if that could explain the faster start.  

I guess one thing I was trying to figure out was whether I have performed the modifications correctly.  I seem to be having a hard time getting the leading edge really straight and sharp and angled the right direction.   Like on my second attempt it seemed like instead of getting a sharp edge I got a sloping, rounded over &quot;edge&quot;, which seems unlikely to cut anything, and then I was trying to work it back to get rid of the rounding.   (I also have a hard time figuring out what I actually did.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I finally managed to snatch a couple minutes to modify another one.   I tried it before.  It took for ever to start and then it split the work.  I modified it.  Then it seemed to dive into the wood&#8230;much faster start, certainly&#8230;but it still split the work.  Maybe I was too close to the edge for hope of not splitting, about 1/2&#8243;.   But the other modified one seems to be much slower.   The test piece is only 1/2&#8243; thick, so maybe I&#8217;ll try deeper holes in something else.   I&#8217;m wondering if I made the tip sharper on the second one and if that could explain the faster start.  </p>
<p>I guess one thing I was trying to figure out was whether I have performed the modifications correctly.  I seem to be having a hard time getting the leading edge really straight and sharp and angled the right direction.   Like on my second attempt it seemed like instead of getting a sharp edge I got a sloping, rounded over &#8220;edge&#8221;, which seems unlikely to cut anything, and then I was trying to work it back to get rid of the rounding.   (I also have a hard time figuring out what I actually did.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://www.rpwoodwork.com/blog/2010/10/19/improving-gimlets-yes-they-can-work/#comment-29480</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2011 05:42:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rpwoodwork.com/blog/?p=925#comment-29480</guid>
		<description>The modified gimlet cuts some of the wood fibers rather than just squeezing past them. So it binds less and in that way is faster - it requires less force. More importantly it cuts better - it avoids splitting.

If you put enough force into the twist, the actual speed of entry would be dictated only by the thread pitch in both the unmodified and modified gimlets. 

So I wouldn&#039;t get hung up on counting the revolutions, but rather look at the overall performance of the tool with this modification.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The modified gimlet cuts some of the wood fibers rather than just squeezing past them. So it binds less and in that way is faster &#8211; it requires less force. More importantly it cuts better &#8211; it avoids splitting.</p>
<p>If you put enough force into the twist, the actual speed of entry would be dictated only by the thread pitch in both the unmodified and modified gimlets. </p>
<p>So I wouldn&#8217;t get hung up on counting the revolutions, but rather look at the overall performance of the tool with this modification.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adrian</title>
		<link>http://www.rpwoodwork.com/blog/2010/10/19/improving-gimlets-yes-they-can-work/#comment-29387</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jan 2011 20:19:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rpwoodwork.com/blog/?p=925#comment-29387</guid>
		<description>I didn&#039;t trust myself to be able to tell the difference before and after, so I was comparing an unmodified one to a modified one.  (This does mean, however, that they aren&#039;t exactly the same size.)   I think the scrap I grabbed for testing might have been basswood, perhaps not the best test material?  (Or does it matter?)  

I used the specific file you recommend.  I did have some uncertainty about how much material needed to be removed.   That file can make a fairly narrow slot.  I widened it some over the minimum size.  

When you say it&#039;s faster, do you mean faster to start or faster all the time?  Does faster mean that I&#039;ll get a deeper hole with the same number of revolutions?  (That would be easy to test because I could count revolutions before I modify the gimlet and then repeat afterward.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t trust myself to be able to tell the difference before and after, so I was comparing an unmodified one to a modified one.  (This does mean, however, that they aren&#8217;t exactly the same size.)   I think the scrap I grabbed for testing might have been basswood, perhaps not the best test material?  (Or does it matter?)  </p>
<p>I used the specific file you recommend.  I did have some uncertainty about how much material needed to be removed.   That file can make a fairly narrow slot.  I widened it some over the minimum size.  </p>
<p>When you say it&#8217;s faster, do you mean faster to start or faster all the time?  Does faster mean that I&#8217;ll get a deeper hole with the same number of revolutions?  (That would be easy to test because I could count revolutions before I modify the gimlet and then repeat afterward.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://www.rpwoodwork.com/blog/2010/10/19/improving-gimlets-yes-they-can-work/#comment-29227</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jan 2011 03:25:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rpwoodwork.com/blog/?p=925#comment-29227</guid>
		<description>Adrian,

The gimlets cut considerably faster with this modification. Try before and after. 

It helps a lot to use a very narrow, very sharp file like the Japanese feather-edge saw file to create a sharp-edged channel. Look at the right side of the channel in the gimlets and the screws, above. It bites the wood.

I hope this helps. Let me know if you&#039;re still having trouble.

Rob</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adrian,</p>
<p>The gimlets cut considerably faster with this modification. Try before and after. </p>
<p>It helps a lot to use a very narrow, very sharp file like the Japanese feather-edge saw file to create a sharp-edged channel. Look at the right side of the channel in the gimlets and the screws, above. It bites the wood.</p>
<p>I hope this helps. Let me know if you&#8217;re still having trouble.</p>
<p>Rob</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adrian</title>
		<link>http://www.rpwoodwork.com/blog/2010/10/19/improving-gimlets-yes-they-can-work/#comment-29219</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jan 2011 01:55:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rpwoodwork.com/blog/?p=925#comment-29219</guid>
		<description>So I have tried to do this to one of my gimlets and I&#039;m not sure I can really tell the difference.   Maybe I didn&#039;t do it correctly.  Can you say how you could tell that a &quot;big improvement&quot; had occurred?  (In other words, what&#039;s a test I can try?)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So I have tried to do this to one of my gimlets and I&#8217;m not sure I can really tell the difference.   Maybe I didn&#8217;t do it correctly.  Can you say how you could tell that a &#8220;big improvement&#8221; had occurred?  (In other words, what&#8217;s a test I can try?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://www.rpwoodwork.com/blog/2010/10/19/improving-gimlets-yes-they-can-work/#comment-17756</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Oct 2010 23:13:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rpwoodwork.com/blog/?p=925#comment-17756</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Eric. Ha, ha, I think there&#039;s more than a few other tools that could be added to the &quot;cruel joke&quot; list. But at least gimlets can be made to work.
Rob</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Eric. Ha, ha, I think there&#8217;s more than a few other tools that could be added to the &#8220;cruel joke&#8221; list. But at least gimlets can be made to work.<br />
Rob</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://www.rpwoodwork.com/blog/2010/10/19/improving-gimlets-yes-they-can-work/#comment-17753</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Oct 2010 22:27:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rpwoodwork.com/blog/?p=925#comment-17753</guid>
		<description>Rob,

Kudos for trying to fight back against these tools. No doubt they can be effective, but just looking at gimlets makes my hands hurt. I&#039;m convinced they were invented as a cruel joke to woodworkers. 

-Eric</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rob,</p>
<p>Kudos for trying to fight back against these tools. No doubt they can be effective, but just looking at gimlets makes my hands hurt. I&#8217;m convinced they were invented as a cruel joke to woodworkers. </p>
<p>-Eric</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://www.rpwoodwork.com/blog/2010/10/19/improving-gimlets-yes-they-can-work/#comment-17740</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Oct 2010 19:28:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rpwoodwork.com/blog/?p=925#comment-17740</guid>
		<description>Hi Tico,

I also have a flexible shaft for my cordless power drill and that also comes in handy now and then. For a door catch, drawer stop, jig assembly, etc - that type of thing where I&#039;ve painted myself into a corner, are where the gimlets are handy. They are really quite compact, especially the smaller diameters.

Another tool that has helped in similar situations is this little helper from Lee Valley: 
http://www.leevalley.com/US/wood/page.aspx?p=32210&amp;cat=1,43411,43417
It holds hex head driver bits AND hex head drill bits, such as Insty Bits. Slow, but it works.

Shannon and Swirt,

I do suggest using the Japanese file if you are going to work on the gimlets. The file costs almost as much as the gimlets, but it&#039;s a tremendously handy tool to have around the shop. It&#039;s very sharp. You can also use it to modify the Hock scraper blade as I&#039;ve discussed here:
http://www.rpwoodwork.com/blog/2010/07/20/working-with-the-veritas-scraping-plane-part-3-microtoothing/

Thanks for reading guys,

Rob</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Tico,</p>
<p>I also have a flexible shaft for my cordless power drill and that also comes in handy now and then. For a door catch, drawer stop, jig assembly, etc &#8211; that type of thing where I&#8217;ve painted myself into a corner, are where the gimlets are handy. They are really quite compact, especially the smaller diameters.</p>
<p>Another tool that has helped in similar situations is this little helper from Lee Valley:<br />
<a href="http://www.leevalley.com/US/wood/page.aspx?p=32210&#038;cat=1,43411,43417" rel="nofollow">http://www.leevalley.com/US/wood/page.aspx?p=32210&#038;cat=1,43411,43417</a><br />
It holds hex head driver bits AND hex head drill bits, such as Insty Bits. Slow, but it works.</p>
<p>Shannon and Swirt,</p>
<p>I do suggest using the Japanese file if you are going to work on the gimlets. The file costs almost as much as the gimlets, but it&#8217;s a tremendously handy tool to have around the shop. It&#8217;s very sharp. You can also use it to modify the Hock scraper blade as I&#8217;ve discussed here:<br />
<a href="http://www.rpwoodwork.com/blog/2010/07/20/working-with-the-veritas-scraping-plane-part-3-microtoothing/" rel="nofollow">http://www.rpwoodwork.com/blog/2010/07/20/working-with-the-veritas-scraping-plane-part-3-microtoothing/</a></p>
<p>Thanks for reading guys,</p>
<p>Rob</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Make That Gimlet Cut : : Frugal Woodworking</title>
		<link>http://www.rpwoodwork.com/blog/2010/10/19/improving-gimlets-yes-they-can-work/#comment-17729</link>
		<dc:creator>Make That Gimlet Cut : : Frugal Woodworking</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Oct 2010 17:49:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rpwoodwork.com/blog/?p=925#comment-17729</guid>
		<description>[...] visit &gt;&gt; Improving Gimlets at Heartwood Blog [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] visit &gt;&gt; Improving Gimlets at Heartwood Blog [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: swirt</title>
		<link>http://www.rpwoodwork.com/blog/2010/10/19/improving-gimlets-yes-they-can-work/#comment-17722</link>
		<dc:creator>swirt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Oct 2010 16:36:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rpwoodwork.com/blog/?p=925#comment-17722</guid>
		<description>That is a great solution.  Thanks for documenting it so well.  I&#039;ve avoided buying these gimlets beacause I&#039;ve heard they were less than helpful.  Now that has changed, thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is a great solution.  Thanks for documenting it so well.  I&#8217;ve avoided buying these gimlets beacause I&#8217;ve heard they were less than helpful.  Now that has changed, thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

