<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Three scraping tools, two I use</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rpwoodwork.com/blog/2009/06/02/three-scraping-tools-two-i-use/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rpwoodwork.com/blog/2009/06/02/three-scraping-tools-two-i-use/</link>
	<description>inside the woodshop</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 14:51:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://www.rpwoodwork.com/blog/2009/06/02/three-scraping-tools-two-i-use/#comment-1454</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 22:18:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rpwoodwork.com/blog/?p=412#comment-1454</guid>
		<description>Hi Tico,

It&#039;s really a matter of personal preference, but I find the 45 degree edge too aggressive for smoothing. I also think the 90 degree edge is less prone to chatter. The 45 seems to &quot;grab&quot; the wood and sometimes gets distorted, whereas the 90 seems to hold a steadier cut. (I doubt a 90 edge would work with the thick L-N blade.)

Regarding the L-N, it is a well-made tool but I agree with your comments. Being able to bow the blade in the Veritas tool helps with sensitive depth adjustment and it pre-tensions the blade to reduce chatter.

Thanks for your comment.

Rob</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Tico,</p>
<p>It&#8217;s really a matter of personal preference, but I find the 45 degree edge too aggressive for smoothing. I also think the 90 degree edge is less prone to chatter. The 45 seems to &#8220;grab&#8221; the wood and sometimes gets distorted, whereas the 90 seems to hold a steadier cut. (I doubt a 90 edge would work with the thick L-N blade.)</p>
<p>Regarding the L-N, it is a well-made tool but I agree with your comments. Being able to bow the blade in the Veritas tool helps with sensitive depth adjustment and it pre-tensions the blade to reduce chatter.</p>
<p>Thanks for your comment.</p>
<p>Rob</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tico vogt</title>
		<link>http://www.rpwoodwork.com/blog/2009/06/02/three-scraping-tools-two-i-use/#comment-1452</link>
		<dc:creator>tico vogt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 12:01:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rpwoodwork.com/blog/?p=412#comment-1452</guid>
		<description>Hi Rob,
It is interesting to me that you  work with a ninety degree edge on the scraper plane blade. What pushed you or gave you the idea to try it? I own the LN large scraper, and it is a fussy tool to get set just right. One thing that doesn&#039;t happen, which used to with #80 scraper, is the snapping of the blade once it exits off the far edge of the board. Getting just the right angle and projection on the LN is surprisingly tricky. I wonder if a ninety degree edge is worth trying. What accounts for the handling difference, do you think, for a burr raised on a 45 versus a 90 degree edge?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Rob,<br />
It is interesting to me that you  work with a ninety degree edge on the scraper plane blade. What pushed you or gave you the idea to try it? I own the LN large scraper, and it is a fussy tool to get set just right. One thing that doesn&#8217;t happen, which used to with #80 scraper, is the snapping of the blade once it exits off the far edge of the board. Getting just the right angle and projection on the LN is surprisingly tricky. I wonder if a ninety degree edge is worth trying. What accounts for the handling difference, do you think, for a burr raised on a 45 versus a 90 degree edge?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://www.rpwoodwork.com/blog/2009/06/02/three-scraping-tools-two-i-use/#comment-1401</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 19:23:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rpwoodwork.com/blog/?p=412#comment-1401</guid>
		<description>Hi Amos,

The scraper plane works well for larger areas. It is less tiring on the fingers than a card scraper, it can be set up to take a more aggressive cut, and maintains a flat surface more reliably. It takes some trial and error to get comfortable with it but it&#039;s a cool tool.

Rob</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Amos,</p>
<p>The scraper plane works well for larger areas. It is less tiring on the fingers than a card scraper, it can be set up to take a more aggressive cut, and maintains a flat surface more reliably. It takes some trial and error to get comfortable with it but it&#8217;s a cool tool.</p>
<p>Rob</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amos</title>
		<link>http://www.rpwoodwork.com/blog/2009/06/02/three-scraping-tools-two-i-use/#comment-1400</link>
		<dc:creator>Amos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 15:49:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rpwoodwork.com/blog/?p=412#comment-1400</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your excellent post on scrapers.  In what situations do you use the LV scraping plane instead of the handheld scrapers?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your excellent post on scrapers.  In what situations do you use the LV scraping plane instead of the handheld scrapers?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

